The union spokesmen claim that, in this situation, USCA is obliged to resume and intensify trade union action for the removal of sanctions open 61 ACC Barcelona. The union believes “incomprehensible imposing these records after the trial of Gava, who instructed the criminal proceedings, determine the lack of accountability of the sanctioned” and 20 juzgadosde Spain “have ended in emphatic that there was no disobedience or abandonment by controllers in court events.”
They consider unacceptable position Ático about “finding an agreed solution for the readmission of Marco Antonio Enriquez driver, as the trial court for Santiago de Compostela, in charge of the criminal case,” he affirmed that they were false arguments the company based its decision to dismiss him.”
Moreover, USCA said it expects Ático and the Ministry of Development “did not violate the fundamental right to strike by drivers with the imposition of abusive minimum services, as happened in previous calls that they were fixed in 70 stoppages% for June and rose to 80% for July, which, in his view, “is a discrimination against other workers in essential services in Spain and certainly compared to the group of drivers from other countries in the European Union”.
These minimum services decreed by Fomento have been challenged by USCA them as “abusive” and have been distributed so that “only the right to strike of the drivers that did not develop directly operating activities was respected”.